Harmon v. Koch
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Meeks, J.:
Charles and Dawn Harmon appeal the trial court’s finding that Dale and Reba Koch were not negligent in the containment of their livestock and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable to cases involving escaped livestock.
In the early morning hours of December 6, 1994, Charles Harmon was driving home from his job in Beloit when he came upon six calves lined up across the road.
Charles claimed that he was driving 40 miles per hour and had very little time to react in order to avoid hitting the animals. Charles struck the calves, three of them came up onto the hood of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Wilson v. RuleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Martin v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frans v. GausmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Jewett v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Wrinkle v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010