Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Atkinson, Admr.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1940No. 27911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The question is thus stated in the brief filed by the Attorney G-eneral on behalf of defendant :

“Is a person who sells goods for another and who is compensated therefor by commissions calculated on the amount of goods sold, an employee within the meaning of the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Act, where such person is subject to no direction or control from the person for whom he sells and is not obligated to devote any time to such selling operations unless he so chooses ? ’ ’

Attached to that brief are copies of “opinions” rendered by the chief of what is termed the “Legal…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meredith Publishing Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Iden v. Atkinson, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hauswirth v. Board of Review of Unemployment CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API