Legal Opinion

Townsend v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1946No. 3297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Eastman Richard1 was an enrolled full-blood Creek Indian owning both his individual allotment and allotments he had inherited. Oil production from these allotments resulted in royalty payments under oil and gas leases accumulating to Richard’s credit in the Union Agency at Muskogee, Oklahoma. Richard was an adult and competent.

In 1919, an action was brought against Richard in the District Court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, seeking damages for alleged alienation of affections. A verdict was returned against Richard for $2,-000. From an order granting the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. House v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. American Nat. Bank v. American Baptist Home Mission Soc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Harnik v. LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  3. Jefferson v. DamronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Bradburn v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API