Legal Opinion

Ronnie Dooley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 16, 2013No. 12-1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY joined.

OPINION

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider an issue of automobile insurance coverage in a policy issued by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Hartford). We review whether the district court erred in holding that the Hartford policy prohibited Ronnie S. Dooley, the insured party, from “stacking,” or combining, the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage (UM/UIM coverage) for each insured vehicle, when the policy failed to specify any particular amount of UM/…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henry v. PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  4. Lipscombe v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  5. Couch v. JabeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. BuckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API