Ronnie Dooley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge GREGORY joined.
OPINION
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider an issue of automobile insurance coverage in a policy issued by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (Hartford). We review whether the district court erred in holding that the Hartford policy prohibited Ronnie S. Dooley, the insured party, from “stacking,” or combining, the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage (UM/UIM coverage) for each insured vehicle, when the policy failed to specify any particular amount of UM/…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henry v. PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Lipscombe v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Couch v. JabeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Porter v. BuckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015