Legal Opinion

Imerman v. London

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 19, 2002No. A02A0681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

The payees of a promissory note brought suit against the guarantor of the note. In an agreement referred to as a “global settlement agreement,” the parties settled the suit and others. The question for decision is whether the global settlement agreement is entire or sev-erable. The superior court concluded that it is severable. We disagree and reverse.

A Georgia limited partnership made a promissory note payable to Bob London and others (London) in the principal sum of $469,982. Jonathan Imerman guaranteed payment of the note but ignored a demand by London to begin making…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bulloch South, Inc. v. GosaiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CS-Lakeview at Gwinnett, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. In re: NRPF Group Two, LLC, et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API