Legal Opinion

Mann v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1922No. 6756. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Motions for Rehearing.

Both appellant and appellee have filed motions for rehearing. Appellant especially complains that our statement of the pleadings and obligations sued upon is not sufficiently detailed, so as to present the facts upon which the plea of the statute of limitations may be more apparent, which we accordingly do. The suit was filed January 6, 1316, by receiver of the Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance Company, a corporation, but its residence and domicile is not alleged, and declares on a promissory note dated the 30th of January, 1911, for the sum of $1,750, due the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Nueces Hotel Co. v. Weil Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Owensboro Seating & Cabinet Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API