Farr v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Presiding Judge.
From his conviction of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree and sentence to one to five years’ imprisonment, the defendant below, Tommy Farr, appeals in error.
The defendant first contends that the Criminal Court of Hamilton County was without jurisdiction to try the case and erred in not sustaining his motion to quash the indictment. He says the criminal court had no jurisdiction because the municipal court lacked jurisdiction to (1) conduct a' preliminary hearing on the state warrant it issued and (2) to bind the de*813fendant over to the grand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. GraceTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Jones v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BlackmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Mattress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- State v. WallaceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- State of Tennessee v. John Wesley WrightCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.