Nesbitt v. Walters
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Hood. Tried below before the Hon. Charles Soward. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, P. J.
On the trial of this cause, after the evidence had been closed, the court of its own motion limited the counsel for plaintiff and defendants to ten minutes in which to present their cause to the jury. This was such an error as will require a reversal of the judgment. *577Parties'li tigant have a right to be heard, by themselves or counsel, and no person shall be deprived of any rights or privileges excepting by due course of law. We think the court in this case attempted to abridge one of the fundamental rights of every citizen, and which we have no right to overlook.
Upon all trials, whether…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dorn v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Sartain v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by8 opinions
- May v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Heard v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Wetz v. WetzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Louis P. Hyman & Co. v. H. H. Snyder Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Cooper v. Robischung Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.