Legal Opinion

Smith v. Runkle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On appeals from a decree of the prerogative court, reported in 97 Atl. Rep. £96.

1Per curiam

The decree of the prerogative court, affirming the decree, of the orphans court of Essex county, admitting to probate the *258last will and testament and codicil thereto of William Runkle, deceased, in the form therein expressed and adjudged, is in all things affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Martin, filed in the orphans court of Essex county.

This is the case which is designated in the record as admitting to probate the first and second pages in one-half sheet of legal cap paper, as part of the will and codicil.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Gaerison, Swayze, Parker,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. In Re Cravens'estateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. In Re SmalleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  4. In re the estate of AtkinsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1921
  5. Allen v. GidneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API