Legal Opinion

Ex parte Bornee

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1915PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Habeas corpus by Steve Bornee.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, President:

"We have before us under the original jurisdiction of this court, proceedings in habeas corpus by which Steve Bornee seeks discharge from the custody of the jailer of Monongalia County. The controlling facts are as follows: Bornee was indicted by a grand jury in the circuit court of the county named, for alleged violation of a certain provision of the laws of this State prohibiting the selling and handling of liquors. Acts 1915, eh. 7, see. 31. He pleaded not guilty and was put on trial before a jury regularly empaneled and sworn. The trial proceeded to a verdict, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Watson v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API