Legal Opinion

Gerner v. Salem City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 92-2520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We assume in this case that the statement of circumstances provided to appellant Gemer by the board is defective in that it does not meet the requirements of R.C. 3319.11(G)(2).1 We address only the remedial power of a court necessary to ensure that the board follows through on its obligation to provide a statement of circumstances that is not defective; that is, to ensure that it promptly corrects its error. The precise issue before us is whether in an appeal under R.C. 3319.11(G)(7) a court may either order the board to temporarily reinstate Gemer with back pay or grant an award of back pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Cardinal Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matheny v. Frontier Local Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geib v. Triway Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Milliken-Dees v. Salem City School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Dove v. Allen County Educational Service Center Governing BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Geib v. Triway Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wands v. Maple Hts. City School Dist., Unpublished Decision (8-24-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API