Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Feild

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1983No. 83-206PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice.

This suit alleged negligence, of owners, lessors, and sublessors and resulting damages to sublessee for personal injuries because of failure to repair the leased premises. Based on depositions and affidavits, the Craighead County Circuit Court granted summary judgment, holding that the duty to repair rested on the sublessee, appellant Hurst. Summary judgment was granted in favor of appellees Roscoe A. Feild, Jr., Palmer Miller, and James B. Gilbert, owners; and tor appellees Texaco, Inc. and Lee Krigbaum, its agent, lessor; and for appellee Tony Coleman,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collison v. CurtnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Purser v. Corpus Christi State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Robinson v. Rebsamen Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. EE Terry, Inc. v. Cities of Helena and West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Culpepper v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Franklin v. Osca, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Township Builders, Inc. v. Kraus Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Majewski v. CantrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Thomas v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API