Vallejo v. Romero
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BARROW, Chief Justice.
Appellants have perfected their appeal from a take-nothing judgment entered after an instructed verdict for defendant-ap-pellees in appellants’ suit for specific performance of an oral option to purchase real estate or, in the alternative, for damages for breach of said contract.
*717Appellants urge by their first point that there is sufficient evidence to raise fact issues upon the elements alleged by them to take the case out of the Statute of Frauds. Their second point asserts that a fact issue was raised on limitations and that the trial court should have submitted an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Constant v. HoweTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Hines v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- National Resort Communities, Inc. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- King v. MattesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968