Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Nagle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1933No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued in trespass to recover damages for alleged defamatory statements contained in her father’s will. The present appeal is from an order of the court below refusing the prayer of defendants’ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the court as provided by the Act of 1925, P. L. 23. An inspection of the docket entries indicates the appeal must be quashed. The record shows that the summons in trespass issued July 10, 1930. On July 28, 1930, counsel for defendants appeared generally, although plaintiff’s statement of claim was not filed until two days later. Defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stamper v. KogelschatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Gray v. CamacSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BerkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welser v. EalerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Susquehanna County Auditors' ReportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Brookville National Bank & Trust Co. v. Rowland, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API