Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 2018No. CR–17–423PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPhillip T. Whiteaker, Judge

Nathan D. Martin was convicted by the Pulaski County Circuit Court of failing to register as a sex offender after he failed to verify his address as required. On appeal, he challenges the trial court's admission of docket sheets from a North Carolina court as proof he was required to register, claiming the documents were hearsay and improperly authenticated. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Because there was ample evidence presented to support his conviction, we affirm.

In March 2016, Martin was charged as a habitual offender with failing to verify…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Marmolejo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Micah Jackson v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API