Legal Opinion

Whitehall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 7, 2012No. 2D09-2871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

The State charged Thomas Alex Whitehall with fleeing to elude, a third-degree felony. After the speedy trial period had ended, the State filed a superseding information amending the charge to fleeing to elude with high speed or wanton disregard of persons or property, a second-degree felony. A jury convicted Mr. Whitehall of the superseding charge. Because the State could not charge Mr. Whitehall with a new offense after the speedy trial period ended, we reverse the conviction.

Facts and Procedural History

Tampa police arrested Mr. Whitehall on November 4, 2008, after they…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Insko v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. CliftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. State v. AnsleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Pezzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. State v. D.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. McDuffie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Montgomery v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API