Legal Opinion

Di Marco v. Isaac

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1911Published

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of- the City ' Court of the city of Hew York in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion, for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegebich, J.

The defendant, on February 25., 1909, was the owner of the premises known as Ho. 99 Clinton street, in this city. The property was a tenement house of five floors and occupied by sixteen tenants. On January 9, 1909, the defendant leased to one Harris Cohen “ one store, 3 rooms and front basement” in said premises foi; the term of two years from May 1, 1909. Cohen had, prior thereto, been a tenant of the defendant for several years, occupying the same store and rooms; and the lease of January 9, 1909, was a renewal of a former lease. Several years prior to February 25, 1909, 'Cohen had erected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schroeck v. ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Kane v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Margulies v. BeckAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  4. San Filippo v. . American Bill Posting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Curban v. FlammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API