Legal Opinion
Lauritz Rasmussen v. Town of Fair Haven
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 8, 2016No. 2015-131PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.
¶ 1. Taxpayer appeals pro se from the Town of Fair Haven’s assessment of his property for the 2014 grand list. We affirm.
¶ 2. Taxpayer owns real property in the Town of Fair Haven. The property consists of three separately deeded contiguous parcels. There is a main house on one parcel and a rental house on each of the two additional parcels. The town considers the property as one 7.58 acre parcel. See 32 V.S.A. § 4152(a)(3) (defining “parcel” as “all contiguous land in the same ownership, together with all improvements thereon”). The town has assigned a grade of 1 to a 2 acre house site, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Zurn v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- City of Barre v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Devoid v. Town of MiddleburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- Lathrop v. Town of MonktonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Argentine Tango Society v. StoweVermont Superior Court · 2025
- Laverack v. Town of LandgroveVermont Superior Court · 2016
- Regenerative Land v. PoultneyVermont Superior Court · 2026