Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hearst Corp. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 14, 1989No. 71620Published

1DissentBlackmar, Chief Judge

The record demonstrates that the director of revenue, during the period covered by the petition for review, collected sales and use tax from magazines but not from newspapers. It is patent that this practice, if authorized by the governing statutes, would discriminate between different kinds of print media by reason of their content, and so would violate the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575, 103 S.Ct. 1365, 75 L.Ed.2d 295 (1983); Arkansas Writers’ Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. RaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Louisiana Life, Ltd. v. McNamaraLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API