MATTER OF TOMLINSON v. Ward
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (110 AD2d 537). We add only that the extension of the probationary period, under the circumstances of this case, is not a penalty as contemplated by Judiciary Law § 519.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tomlinson v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garcia v. BrattonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bonacci v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Dolcemaschio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rivoli v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Garcia v. BrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.