Legal Opinion

Phelps v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 23, 2010No. A-10709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This case requires us to re-examine and apply the Nealr-Mutschler rule — the rule that, when a defendant is being sentenced for two or more crimes, the defendant’s composite sentence of imprisonment may not exceed the maximum sentence of imprisonment for the defendant’s single most serious offense unless the sentencing judge affirmatively finds that a longer term of imprisonment is necessary to protect the public. See Neal v. State, 628 P.2d 19, 21 (Alaska 1981); Powell v. State, 88 P.3d 532, 537 & n. 9 (Alaska App.2004).

In the present case, the defendant was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  4. Donlun v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mutschler v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Leopold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  3. Frankson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API