Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship Clerks

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 1952No. 4594-51PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are Negro employees of the defendant Baltimore & Ohio Railroad and members of the so-called craft or class of clerks, freight handlers, express and station employees. Defendant Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Qerks is the ■collective bargaining representative under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., of the members of this craft.

The facts alleged by the complaint may be summarized as follows: on January 10, 1951 Congress amended the Railway Labor Act so as to permit railroads and labor organizations representing employees under said Act to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nebraska State v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API