Brownfield v. Hodous

By Judge Mary Jane Hall

The matter came before the Court on (i) Defendant’s motion to determine applicability of attorney-client privilege to certain documents that were produced inadvertently by Plaintiff’s counsel and over which Plaintiff asserts a claim of privilege, and (ii) Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of privileged communications between Defendants and Kim Heischman for the purpose of providing legal advice to Heischman personally or for the purpose of providing legal advice to Ivy Gardens, L.L.C., a business entity in which Plaintiff owns no interest. Plaintiff denies that…