Legal Opinion

Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. Cameron

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1895No. 404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the United States Court in the Indian Territory. Action by Nannie Cameron against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa.Fe Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

Nannie Cameron, the defendant in error, brought an action against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, the plaintiff in error, in l.he United States court In the Indian Territory, to recover damages for its failure to stop one of its trains, on which she was a passenger, at Moore, a small station on its road in the territory of Oklahoma. She recovered a verdict, and the case comes to this court on a writ of error sued out by the defendant railroad company. In her complaint the plaintiff below averred that on June 4, 1891, she purchased from the agent of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Duling v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Plott v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  2. Ohage v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API