Legal Opinion

City Street Improvement Co. v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1916No. Civ. No. 1544Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The petitioner, a corporation, filed a petition in the court below for a writ of mandate to force the mayor of the city of Santa Rosa, a municipal corporation, to enter into a contract with the said petitioner for doing certain street work on Santa Rosa Avenue, in said city. .

The respondent, mayor, answered the petition, and certain property owners, whose property abuts upon said street and which would, as a consequence, be assessed for the improvement which had been proposed to be made on said avenue, providing the proceedings were legal and valid, filed a complaint in intervention. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API