Disciplinary Counsel v. Bukstein
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Kimberley Bukstein, is not licensed to practice law in the state of Ohio. On May 21, 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a complaint against Bukstein with the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. That complaint alleged that Bukstein engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by providing legal advice, drafting a motion for a party to sign pro se, and sending communications demanding discovery and making legal arguments on behalf of parties in two domestic-relations cases. In her answer, Bukstein admitted that she engaged in some of the alleged conduct, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. PearlmanOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. McGinnisOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. JoelsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Zubaidah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Beem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021