Legal Opinion

Marcus Roberts v. At&t Mobility LLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 2017No. 16-16915PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Marcus Roberts, Ashley and Kenneth Chewey, and James Krenn (“Plaintiffs”) appeal an order compelling arbitration of their putative class action claims against AT&T Mobility LLC (“AT&T”). Plaintiffs allege that AT&T falsely advertised their mobile service plans as “unlimited” when in fact it intentionally slowed data at certain usage levels. AT&T moved to compel arbitration, and Plaintiffs opposed on First Amendment grounds. The district court compelled arbitration, holding as a threshold matter that there was no state action.

On appeal, Plaintiffs raise two…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Melissa Belgau v. Jay InsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Cooley v. Cal. Statewide Law Enforcement Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (PS) Sanai v. CobraeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Agrifina Corpuz Quiane v. West Physicians Associates, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026
  5. Al McZeal v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API