Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court'.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The appellant filed his claim, in the form of an account, against the appellee, for per diem services rendered in the Washington Circuit Court, as clerk there*384of, at the rate of two dollars, for eighty-six dollars, rendered during' the August and October terms, 1879.

The appellee refused to allow the claim; the appellant appealed to the circuit court, wherein the case was tried by the court, and a finding had for the appellee. It was admitted on trial, that the appellant had rendered the services as charged, and that he was, during all the time, the clerk of the Washington Circuit Court. Appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudisill v. EdsallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ex parte McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Middleton v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Calhoun Gold Mining Co. v. Ajax Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API