Legal Opinion
Chisman v. Moylan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 10, 1958No. 430PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 So.2d 186 (1958)
William E. CHISMAN, Jr., et al., Appellants,
v.
E.B. MOYLAN, Jr., et al., Appellees.
No. 430.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
September 10, 1958.
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellants.
Treadwell & Treadwell, Arcadia, for appellees.
KANNER, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal in chancery from final decree of the chancellor dismissing appellants' suit wherein they sought certain relief involving employer and broker relationship in a real estate transaction.
There is no need to give a detailed recital of the facts of the case. It may be said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Ahern v. Florida Real Estate Commission Ex Rel. O'KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Van Woy v. WillisSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Florida Real Estate Commission v. McGregorSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Tyler v. TylerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Kline v. Pyms Suchman Real Estate CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Czarnecki v. RollerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- DuPont v. Parker and Company of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.