Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Grund
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 14, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, is not obligated to defend and/or indemnify the defendants Helmuth Grund, Bayer Leasing Corporation, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation in connection with an action entitled Grund v Bayer Leasing Corp., which had been pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated July 29, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment and granted the cross motions of the defendants Agnes Grund and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Morgan v. Greater New York Taxpayers Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Greaves v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Atlantic Cement Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. KhalifeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- BMW Financial Services N. A. v. HassanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998