Legal Opinion
In re Priceline.com Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 4, 2006No. 3:00CV01884 (DJS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
Lead plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of members of a putative class of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of priceline.com Inc. (“Priceline”) between January 27, 2000 and October 2, 2000, pursuant to Sections 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and 20(a), 15 U.S.C. § 78t, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”), as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-78mm, and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder, against Priceline, Jay S. Walker,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re: Scholastic Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Veronica Caridad, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lapin v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- McIntire v. China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- In Re Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- In re Federal National Mortgage Ass'n Securities, Derivative, & "Erisa" LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.