Legal Opinion

Robel Afewerki v. Anaya Law Group

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2017No. 15-56510PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., prohibits debt collectors from making false statements when attempting to collect debts from consumers. 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. Not all false statements are actionable, however. To constitute a violation of the FDCPA, a false statement must be “material.” Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., 592 F.3d 1027, 1033 (9th Cir. 2010).

What makes a false statement material or immaterial in the debt collection world? Material false statements, we have held, are those that could “cause the least…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Travis Gonzales v. Carmax Auto Superstores, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Desire, LLC v. Manna Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Timlick v. Nat'l Enter. Sys., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Aguilar v. Mandarich Law Grp.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Ardreda Johnson v. Pennymac Loan Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Bellini v. Patenaude & Felix APCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API