Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Renner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Clay District Court. Action brought by Renner, & physician and surgeon, against the Board of Commissioners of Clay County, to recover $620, for professional services.

Read the full summary

Error from Clay District Court. Action brought by Renner, & physician and surgeon, against the Board of Commissioners of Clay County, to recover $620, for professional services. Trial by the court at the May Term, 1881, upon the following agreed statement of facts: “1st. From the 12th day of January, 1880, to the 27th day ■of June, 1880, both days inclusive, plaintiff William H. Renner, was a practicing physician in Athelstane township, in the •county of Clay, in the state of Kansas. “2d. From said 12th of January, 1880, to said 27th of June, 1880, one Joel Alexander was a resident pauper of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

No error is shown by the record in this case. Certainly none is referred to specifically, as required by rule 2 of the supreme court rules. Counsel for defendant in error has particularly called our attention to the fact that the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error does not specifically refer to any page of the record as showing error, and he does so in the following language, to wit:

“ Counsel for plaintiff in error have not referred to any particular portions of the record, nor specified any particular error, *227matter or thing which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Commissioners of Shawnee CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Comm'rs of Pottawatomie Co. v. MorrallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melencamp v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API