Legal Opinion

Ira S. Bushey, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1941No. 333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts as the judge found them were as follows. The “Derby” backed with a line from her forward bitt to the mid bitt of the “Essex’s” bow, the master or bargee of the “Essex” having stationed himself at her bow to give a signal when the barge should come into position. Both vessels had agreed that the “Derby” should stop at this signal, thus making the necessary slack in the towing line so that it might be cast off. The “Derby” followed out this agreement, backing with no unusual speed and stopping when she got the signal. The barge did not however stop at the proper place but came on and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. David B. Dale v. Henry P. Rosenfeld, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Henry P. Rosenfeld Co., Samson Wallach and Abraham S. GechtmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Barbarino v. Stanhope S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Kreste v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Kreste v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API