Legal Opinion

Lidel v. Kelly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1958No. 34439PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In this automobile accident case, the jury found for the defendants, but the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based solely on the failure to give plaintiff’s requested instruction on the following-car doctrine. The defendants appeal from the order granting a new trial.

The statute 2 declares that vehicles shall not follow other vehicles more closely than is reasonable or prudent. The

omitted requested instruction so states. 3 Appellants contend the omission of this instruction was not erroneous, because in another instruction 4 the court did advise, the jury that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DeKoning v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Carraway v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hester v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Harris v. FioreWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pakka v. FitzpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API