Lidel v. Kelly
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
In this automobile accident case, the jury found for the defendants, but the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based solely on the failure to give plaintiff’s requested instruction on the following-car doctrine. The defendants appeal from the order granting a new trial.
The statute 2 declares that vehicles shall not follow other vehicles more closely than is reasonable or prudent. The
omitted requested instruction so states. 3 Appellants contend the omission of this instruction was not erroneous, because in another instruction 4 the court did advise, the jury that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- DeKoning v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wendt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Carraway v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Hester v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Harris v. FioreWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Pakka v. FitzpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.