Legal Opinion

Wolbol v. Steinhoff

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1917No. 897Published

ERROR to the District Court, Albany County; HoN. V. J.. Tidball, Judge. Action by Sarah Steinhoff, et al., against Katrine Wolbol, as executrix. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Wolbol succeeded to all rights of the original entryman and of Lewis and the bank and held the same at the time of the land office proceedings, but the holders of the Dean title had no notice or knowledge of the land office proceedings.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the District Court, Albany County; HoN. V. J.. Tidball, Judge. Action by Sarah Steinhoff, et al., against Katrine Wolbol, as executrix. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Wolbol succeeded to all rights of the original entryman and of Lewis and the bank and held the same at the time of the land office proceedings, but the holders of the Dean title had no notice or knowledge of the land office proceedings. The rule that a decision of the land department relating to public lands and conducted upon notice is conclusive is…

1Opinion

ON PETITION ROR RRHRARING.

Blydrnburgh, Justice.

Counsel for defendant in error has filed an application for a rehearing in this case and assigned thirty-five reasons or alleged errors in the decision of this court, accompanied by an elaborate brief. There seems to be but two points alleged why a rehearing should be had, or the opinion handed down November 1, 1917, in this case withdrawn or modified, that were not fully gone into and presented in the original briefs, viz.: First, that the writer hereof had taken his seat as a member of this court since the hearing and decision, and should take…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laramie National Bank v. SteinhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API