Legal Opinion
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Borough of Wood-Ridge
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided January 29, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVERS, J. T. C.
The Borough of Wood-Ridge (borough) moved for leave to file a counterclaim beyond the time limits prescribed in response to the 1980 complaint filed by Curtiss-Wright Corporation (taxpayer). This motion and taxpayer’s argument in opposition thereto presents to the Court the task of construing and applying to this situation various rules of procedure and oft cited decisions which are basic to the tax court practice. The facts follow.
Taxpayer is the largest taxpayer in the borough and one of the largest taxpayers in the entire state. In May 1979 the parties entered into an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- White v. Violent Crimes Compensation BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Borough of Fort Lee v. Hudson Terrace ApartmentsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Prospect Hill Apts. v. FlemingtonNew Jersey Tax Court · 1979
- Prospect Hill Apts. v. Borough of FlemingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris PlainsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Curtiss Wright Corp. v. Wood-Ridge BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
- Diament v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.