Legal Opinion

Neal v. City of Blackwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1983No. 59028PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that appellant-plaintiff’s cause of action against the City of Blackwell was barred by the six-month statute of limitations set forth in 51 O.S.Supp.1978, § 156(C), governing the filing of claims and actions against political subdivisions under the Oklahoma Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act.

Following her alleged injury of September 3, 1979, the appellant timely filed a written claim with the City of Blackwell in accordance with 51 O.S.Supp.1978, § 151. On November 9, 1979, the city received the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duesterhaus v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Trent Ex Rel. Trent v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Whitley v. Oologah Independent School District No. I-4 of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API