Legal Opinion

Bouldin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 2002No. 04-02-00280-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice.

Kris Rusty Bouldin (“Bouldin”) appeals the trial court’s judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to two years confinement. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding a “truncated” hearing on Boul-din’s motion for new trial. Specifically, Bouldin contends that he should have been permitted to present additional evidence regarding whether his plea of true *356at the revocation hearing was involuntary. Bouldin asserts that his plea was involuntary because he was misled into rejecting an earlier plea bargain based on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Lanum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Barnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  2. Adrian Nathan Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Carlos Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Jose Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API