Legal Opinion
Turley v. Gaetz
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 14, 2010No. 09-3847PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Gregory Turley, an Illinois prisoner, filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the warden, a number of guards and other employees at Menard Correctional Center (“Menard”) retaliated against him for litigation previously filed regarding his conditions of confinement. Mr. Turley moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), but the district court concluded that he was ineligible due to the “three-strikes” rule of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Relying on our opinions in George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607-08…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lira v. HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Quintez Talley v. John E. WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Haddrick Byrd v. Robert ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Hoskins v. DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.