Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

This case is before ns on a rehearing, being originally reported in 126 N. C., 971. We hare again given it careful consideration, and have been forced to the same Conclusions announced in our former opinion. It seems useless to again discuss the principles involved, as they are few and simple as the case is viewed by us. The plaintiff had a contract of insurance with the defendant, which the latter seems to have violated in its most essential features with the result of having destroyed its value to' the plaintiff. But it is said that the plaintiff made such contract of insurance with a…