Legal Opinion
Tan v. Tan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated February 2, 1998, as (1) determined that he owned 46.63% of the stock of his business, (2) failed to find that the plaintiff wife dissipated marital assets, thereby entitling him to a credit, and (3) directed him to pay 70% of the future college expenses of the parties’ child.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which directed the defendant to pay 70% of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LaBombardi v. LaBombardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Whittaker v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Gilkes v. GilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Friedman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Walls v. WallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bibas v. BibasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Nichols v. NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Felix v. FelixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Jarrell v. JarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Halpern v. KuruvillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001