Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Padgett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Independence Circuit Court; Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge; 1. The court erred in allowing plaintiff to open and close the argument. 61 Ark. 628; Kirby’s Digest, § 6196, par. 6. The burden was on defendant. 95 S. W. Rep. 145; Kirby’s Digest, § 3107. 2. It was error to give instruction No. 5, in which the jury are told that if Roberts kept the policy any time after he could reasonably have surrendered it after examination he was estopped, etc. 3. Instruction No. 1…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Independence Circuit Court; Frederick D. Fulkerson, Judge; 1. The court erred in allowing plaintiff to open and close the argument. 61 Ark. 628; Kirby’s Digest, § 6196, par. 6. The burden was on defendant. 95 S. W. Rep. 145; Kirby’s Digest, § 3107. 2. It was error to give instruction No. 5, in which the jury are told that if Roberts kept the policy any time after he could reasonably have surrendered it after examination he was estopped, etc. 3. Instruction No. 1 asked by defendant should have been given. Carter and Padgett were partners. A partner is not an innocent holder where…

1Opinion of the CourtRiddick, J.

This was an action on a promissory note executed by D. G. Roberts to R. M. Carter for $37.29. The note was executed on 12th of February, 1903, and made payable nine months after date to R. M. Carter or order. Carter was an insurance agent, and the note was executed by Roberts for the first premium on a policy on his life for one thousand dollars. When action was commenced on this note, it had on it the following indorsement: “For value received I assign the within note to T. B. Padgett. [Signed], R. M. Carter.”

Afterwards, when the policy of insurance was issued and sent to Roberts, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Willett v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Mann v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. HowleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Vern Barnett Construction Co. v. J. A. Hadley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Kempner v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Cammack v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Johnson v. StoutSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API