Legal Opinion

Detrio v. Boylan Et Ux

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1951No. 13296_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents for review another feature of litigation which has heretofore been before this Court. The particular issue here involved arises out of the efforts of the Detrios to have a conveyance from Boylan to his wife set aside as fraudulent because of an attempt to escape enforcement of the obligation upon Boylan to account to the Detrios for the partnership interest which was adjudged to exist in De-trio v. Boylan, 5 Cir., 169 F.2d 77, and which was finally adjudged as to amount in Boylan v. Detrio, 5 Cir., 187 F.2d 28. 1 Reference to these decisions will…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dogan, Sheriff v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ferguson v. Winchester Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Groce v. Phoenix InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  4. United States v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Burks v. MoodyMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barbee v. PigottMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Parker v. LivingstonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hux v. ButlerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1963
  4. Rameker v. Peterson (In Re Associated Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Beverly A. Parker v. Dan LivingstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API