Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP Group Long Term Disability Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2014No. 12-55114PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SEDWICK; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
OPINION
SEDWICK, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Bridget Gordon (“Gordon”) appeals the district court’s *749summary judgment in favor of Defendant Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP Group Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”), which is insured by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), based on her failure to file the action within the applicable limitation period. The Plan is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”). We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Coszalter v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Mary Ellen Thomason v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Jorita Padfield v. Aig Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Susan Salyers v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Beverly Oaks Psc, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of IlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Don L. Witt v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Daniel F. v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.