State v. Lakatos
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUMMERS, Judge.
Appellant Rob Lakatos was charged under T.C.A. § 39-17-308(a)(2) with twenty-nine (29) counts of making harassing telephone calls. The trial judge overruled appellant’s motion to dismiss the charges. By agreement with the state, appellant reserved three certified questions of law pursuant to T.R.A.P. 37(2)(i) and entered a best interest plea of guilty to six counts of the indictment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts as stipulated indicate that the appellant called several women and, without identifying himself, falsely represented to them that he was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. LyonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Collection Consultants, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KendrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- City of Fargo v. RoehrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. LanierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- State v. WebsterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Carl G. Berning v. State of Tennessee, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.