Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Department of Human Services

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2010No. 2009-CA-00438-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This case requires that we address three competing interests: the supremacy of federal law over state law; the compelling public interest in child support;1 and *12the compelling public interest in the protection of the mentally disabled.

¶ 2. Kenny Barnes fathered a child out of wedlock. According to a determination made pursuant to Social Security guidelines, Barnes was mentally incompetent. After a paternity test established him as the father, the trial court ordered Barnes to pay child support in the amount of fourteen percent of his income, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. People v. J.G. (In Re J.G.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Baptist Memorial Hospital - North Mississippi, Inc v. C. Jake LambertCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  4. Baptist Memorial Hospital - North Mississippi, Inc v. C. Jake LambertCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  5. Barnes v. Department of Human ServicesMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API