Legal Opinion
Durham v. Southern L. I. Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Gregg. Tried below before the Hon. Z. Norton.
1Opinion of the Court
Roberts, Chief Justice.
Appellant brought a suit against appellee, upon a policy of insurance, on the 25th of March, 1875, in which it was alleged that said company was chartered by an act of the Legislature of the State of Tennessee, and had its domicile and principal office in Memphis, in said State; that said company had a license to transact its business in this State, and that its agents in this State were Hammill, May & Co., whose local office and agency was established in Dallas, in this State. After service upon said agents, or a part of them, the defendant, by its attorneys, filed an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Kanouse v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kleiber v. McManusTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Knopfi v. Gilsonite Roofing & Paving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Birdseye v. ShaefferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1888
- Walker v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Ewert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.