Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reed v. State Ex Rel. Ortiz

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1997No. 22749Published

1ConcurrenceMinzner, Justice

(specially concurring).

128. While I concur in the result reached by the majority, I respectfully disagree with the fugitivity analysis relied upon by the majority. The circumstances of this case require us to consider the respective roles of the courts of this State and those of Ohio, but I believe the analysis on which the majority opinion relies expands the role of an asylum state beyond acceptable limits. Both the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const, art. VI, cl. 2, and the Supreme Law of the Land Clause of the New Mexico Constitution, NM Const, art. II, § 1,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API