Wilson v. Churchman

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

A sequestration having been levied upon goods, Gilchrist bonded them, and a rale was then taken by the defendant and Gilchrist, to show cause why the sequestration should not be set aside. Upon hearing, the court dismissed the rule; and from this refusal to set aside the sequestration, the defendant and third opponent appealed.

Whatever may the right of a party to appeal at once from the refusal to set *344aside a sequestration, by which his property is actually detained in legal custody, we think the right should not be extended to a case…